A Trial of Early Antiretrovirals and Isoniazid Preventive Therapy in Africa

BACKGROUND: In sub-Saharan Africa, the burden of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-associated tuberculosis is high. We conducted a trial with a 2-by-2 factorial design to assess the benefits of early antiretroviral therapy (ART), 6-month isoniazid preventive therapy (IPT), or both among HIV-infected adults with high CD4+ cell counts in Ivory Coast. METHODS: We included participants who had HIV type 1 infection and a CD4+ count of less than 800 cells per cubic millimeter and who met no criteria for starting ART according to World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines. Participants were randomly assigned to one of four treatment groups: deferred ART (ART initiation according to WHO criteria), deferred ART plus IPT, early ART (immediate ART initiation), or early ART plus IPT. The primary end point was a composite of diseases included in the case definition of the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), non-AIDS-defining cancer, non-AIDS-defining invasive bacterial disease, or death from any cause at 30 months. We used Cox proportional models to compare outcomes between the deferred-ART and early-ART strategies and between the IPT and no-IPT strategies. RESULTS: A total of 2056 patients (41% with a baseline CD4+ count of ≥500 cells per cubic millimeter) were followed for 4757 patient-years. A total of 204 primary end-point events were observed (3.8 events per 100 person-years; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.3 to 4.4), including 68 in patients with a baseline CD4+ count of at least 500 cells per cubic millimeter (3.2 events per 100 person-years; 95% CI, 2.4 to 4.0). Tuberculosis and invasive bacterial diseases accounted for 42% and 27% of primary end-point events, respectively. The risk of death or severe HIV-related illness was lower with early ART than with deferred ART (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.76; adjusted hazard ratio among patients with a baseline CD4+ count of ≥500 cells per cubic millimeter, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.94) and lower with IPT than with no IPT (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.88; adjusted hazard ratio among patients with a baseline CD4+ count of ≥500 cells per cubic millimeter, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.36 to 1.01). The 30-month probability of grade 3 or 4 adverse events did not differ significantly among the strategies. CONCLUSIONS: In this African country, immediate ART and 6 months of IPT independently led to lower rates of severe illness than did deferred ART and no IPT, both overall and among patients with CD4+ counts of at least 500 cells per cubic millimeter. (Funded by the French National Agency for Research on AIDS and Viral Hepatitis; TEMPRANO ANRS 12136 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00495651.)

Effect of isoniazid preventive therapy on risk of death in west African, HIV-infected adults with high CD4 cell counts: long-term follow-up of the Temprano ANRS 12136 trial.

BACKGROUND: Temprano ANRS 12136 was a factorial 2 × 2 trial that assessed the benefits of early antiretroviral therapy (ART; ie, in patients who had not reached the CD4 cell count threshold used to recommend starting ART, as per the WHO guidelines that were the standard during the study period) and 6-month isoniazid preventive therapy (IPT) in HIV-infected adults in Côte d'Ivoire. Early ART and IPT were shown to independently reduce the risk of severe morbidity at 30 months. Here, we present the efficacy of IPT in reducing mortality from the long-term follow-up of Temprano. METHODS: For Temprano, participants were randomly assigned to four groups (deferred ART, deferred ART plus IPT, early ART, or early ART plus IPT). Participants who completed the trial follow-up were invited to participate in a post-trial phase. The primary post-trial phase endpoint was death, as analysed by the intention-to-treat principle. We used Cox proportional models to compare all-cause mortality between the IPT and no IPT strategies from inclusion in Temprano to the end of the follow-up period. FINDINGS: Between March 18, 2008, and Jan 5, 2015, 2056 patients (mean baseline CD4 count 477 cells per μL) were followed up for 9404 patient-years (Temprano 4757; post-trial phase 4647). The median follow-up time was 4·9 years (IQR 3·3-5·8). 86 deaths were recorded (Temprano 47 deaths; post-trial phase 39 deaths), of which 34 were in patients randomly assigned IPT (6-year probability 4·1%, 95% CI 2·9-5·7) and 52 were in those randomly assigned no IPT (6·9%, 5·1-9·2). The hazard ratio of death in patients who had IPT compared with those who did not have IPT was 0·63 (95% CI, 0·41 to 0·97) after adjusting for the ART strategy (early vs deferred), and 0·61 (0·39-0·94) after adjustment for the ART strategy, baseline CD4 cell count, and other key characteristics. There was no evidence for statistical interaction between IPT and ART (pinteraction=0·77) or between IPT and time (pinteraction=0·94) on mortality. INTERPRETATION: In Côte d'Ivoire, where the incidence of tuberculosis was last reported as 159 per 100 000 people, 6 months of IPT has a durable protective effect in reducing mortality in HIV-infected people, even in people with high CD4 cell counts and who have started ART. FUNDING: National Research Agency on AIDS and Viral Hepatitis (ANRS)

[A new focus of human paragonimosis discovered in Côte d'Ivoire (West Africa): the case of the Lauzoua Island]

International audienceFifteen cases of human paragonimosis were detected in Ivory Coast from 1974 to 1999. Since no further cases have been reported, an epidemiological survey was carried out in local health centers. The purpose of this paper is to described a new focus of paragonimosis discovered on Lauzoua Island. Clinical and parasitological examinations were performed on 17 patients presenting chronic cough, haemoptysis and/or epilepsy. Stools belonging to cats, dogs and pigs as well as river crustaceans were also examined to identify parasite eggs and metacercariae respectively. Paragonimus eggs were found in stools and/or sputum of five patients. Measurements of these eggs after fixation in formalin allowed division into three groups. Stools from cats, dogs and pigs were negative. Small Paragonimus metacercariae (mean: 277 to 323 microm) were found in three Callinectes marginatus crabs (out of 15 caught near the island). No metacercariae were found in local prawns. The presence of these three Paragonimus egg groups as well as of infected crabs near the island will require further study to identify the species and determine the prevalence of each in human infection

Chimioprophylaxie antituberculeuse primaire à l'isoniazide : une stratégie d'actualité à l’ère du tester et traiter ; revue de la littérature

Position du problème : La tuberculose demeure une menace de santé publique responsable de plus d'un million de décès en 2018. La chimioprophylaxie à l'isoniazide est une des stratégies permettant le contrôle de cette maladie. Encore peu prescrite, son intérêt suscite encore plus de questions à l’ère du « tester et traiter » concernant les antirétroviraux. L'objectif de cette étude est donc de réaliser une revue des essais randomisés de chimioprophylaxie antituberculeuse primaire à l'isoniazide (« thérapie préventive à l'isoniazide », TPI), en distinguant les « essais d'efficacité (EE) » comparant la TPI à un placebo ou à l'absence de chimioprophylaxie ; et les « essais de régime » (ER), comparant la TPI à un ou plusieurs autres régimes. Méthodes : Recherche bibliographique (mots-clés sur les bases de données des articles publiés Medline, Scopus : « tuberculosis », « prophylaxis », « HIV », « randomized controlled trial ») et lecture standardisée d'articles sélectionnés rapportant des résultats d'essais randomisés de TPI chez les personnes infectées par le VIH. Résultats : Au total, 18 essais retenus (11 EE et 7 ER), incluant 19 725 participants. Les régimes étudiés étaient 3H, 6H, 9H, 12H, 36H/2RZ, 3RH, 3RZ, 3RHZ, et 3HP [H : Isoniazide, R : Rifampicine, Z : Pyrazinamide, P : Rifapentine]. Localisation : dix en Afrique, trois à Haïti, un en Inde, un aux USA, un aux Amériques et deux multi continentaux. Dans les EE avec ou sans ARV, la TPI réduit significativement le risque de tuberculose de 32 % à 71 %. Dans les EE avant les ARV, on ne retrouve aucune tendance à une réduction de la mortalité par la TPI. Dans les EE sous ARV, la TPI réduit la mortalité. Dans les ER, on ne trouve aucun argument pour préférer un autre régime à la TPI. La tolérance est bonne. La TPI diminue possiblement le risque de sélection de bacilles multirésistants, au lieu de l'aggraver, par la baisse du nombre d'épisodes de tuberculose et donc de l'utilisation des traitements antituberculeux curatifs. Conclusion : Loin d'avoir été rendue obsolète par le traitement ARV, la TPI reste une intervention d'actualité.BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis remains a public health threat responsible as recently as 2018 for more than one million deaths. Chemoprophylaxis with isoniazid is one of the strategies implemented to control the disease. Although it is not yet widely prescribed, its utilization raises additional questions in the "test and treat" era of for anti-retroviral therapy. The objective of this study is to review the different randomized controlled trials of antitubercular Isoniazid Preventive Therapy (IPT). We have distinguished (a) "efficacy trials" (ET) comparing IPT to a placebo or the absence of chemoprophylaxis and (b) "IPT regimen trials" (RT) comparing IPT to one or several other regimens. METHODS: Literature search (keywords from published articles found in the Medline and Scopus data bases: "tuberculosis", "prophylaxis", "HIV", "randomized controlled trial") and standardized reading of selected articles reporting results from randomized trials of IPT in HIV-infected people. RESULTS: Eighteen selected trials (11 ET and 7 RT), including 19,725 participants. The regimens studied were 3H, 6H, 9H, 12H, 12H, 36H/2RZ, 3RH, 3RZ, 3RHZ, and 3HP [H: Isoniazid, R: Rifampicin, Z: Pyrazinamide, P: Rifapentine]. LOCATIONS: Ten in Africa, three in Haiti, one in India, one in the USA, one in the Americas and two multi-continental trials. In ET with or without antiretrovirals (ART), IPT significantly reduces the risk of tuberculosis, by 32 to 71%. In ET prior to ART, IPT does not appear to reduce mortality. In ET in patients receiving ART, on the other hand, IPT reduces mortality. As regards RT, there seems to be no reason to prefer other regimens to IPT. Tolerance is good. Importantly, IPT may reduce (rather than worsen) the risk of multidrug-resistant bacilli selection by decreasing the number of TB episodes and, consequently, the number of curative tuberculosis treatments. CONCLUSION: Far from becoming obsolete due to ARV treatment, IPT has remained a timely and relevant intervention

Systematic or test-guided treatment for tuberculosis in HIV-infected adults

A trial involving HIV-infected patients with CD4+ T-cell counts below 100 cells per cubic millimeter compared strategies of systematic treatment for TB and treatment only if testing revealed infection. Systematic treatment was not better than treatment guided by testing with respect to the rate of death or bacterial infection. Background In regions with high burdens of tuberculosis and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), many HIV-infected adults begin antiretroviral therapy (ART) when they are already severely immunocompromised. Mortality after ART initiation is high in these patients, and tuberculosis and invasive bacterial diseases are common causes of death. Methods We conducted a 48-week trial of empirical treatment for tuberculosis as compared with treatment guided by testing in HIV-infected adults who had not previously received ART and had CD4+ T-cell counts below 100 cells per cubic millimeter.Patients recruited in Ivory Coast, Uganda, Cambodia, and Vietnam were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to undergo screening (Xpert MTB/RIF test, urinary lipoarabinomannan test, and chest radiography) to determine whether treatment for tuberculosis should be started or to receive systematic empirical treatment with rifampin, isoniazid, ethambutol, and pyrazinamide daily for 2 months, followed by rifampin and isoniazid daily for 4 months. The primary end point was a composite of death from any cause or invasive bacterial disease within 24 weeks (primary analysis) or within 48 weeks after randomization. Results A total of 522 patients in the systematic-treatment group and 525 in the guided-treatment group were included in the analyses.At week 24, the rate of death from any cause or invasive bacterial disease (calculated as the number of first events per 100 patient-years) was 19.4 with systematic treatment and 20.3 with guided treatment (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.63 to 1.44). At week 48, the corresponding rates were 12.8 and 13.3 (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.67 to 1.40]). At week 24, the probability of tuberculosis was lower with systematic treatment than with guided treatment (3.0% vs. 17.9%; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.26), but the probability of grade 3 or 4 drug-related adverse events was higher with systematic treatment (17.4% vs. 7.2%; adjusted hazard ratio 2.57; 95% CI, 1.75 to 3.78).Serious adverse events were more common with systematic treatment. Conclusions Among severely immunosuppressed adults with HIV infection who had not previously received ART, systematic treatment for tuberculosis was not superior to test-guided treatment in reducing the rate of death or invasive bacterial disease over 24 or 48 weeks and was associated with more grade 3 or 4 adverse events.(Funded by the Agence Nationale de Recherches sur le Sida et les Hepatites Virales; STATIS ANRS 12290 ClinicalTrials.gov number,.

N Engl J Med

Background In regions with high burdens of tuberculosis and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), many HIV-infected adults begin antiretroviral therapy (ART) when they are already severely immunocompromised. Mortality after ART initiation is high in these patients, and tuberculosis and invasive bacterial diseases are common causes of death. Methods We conducted a 48-week trial of empirical treatment for tuberculosis as compared with treatment guided by testing in HIV-infected adults who had not previously received ART and had CD4+ T-cell counts below 100 cells per cubic millimeter. Patients recruited in Ivory Coast, Uganda, Cambodia, and Vietnam were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to undergo screening (Xpert MTB/RIF test, urinary lipoarabinomannan test, and chest radiography) to determine whether treatment for tuberculosis should be started or to receive systematic empirical treatment with rifampin, isoniazid, ethambutol, and pyrazinamide daily for 2 months, followed by rifampin and isoniazid daily for 4 months. The primary end point was a composite of death from any cause or invasive bacterial disease within 24 weeks (primary analysis) or within 48 weeks after randomization. Results A total of 522 patients in the systematic-treatment group and 525 in the guided-treatment group were included in the analyses. At week 24, the rate of death from any cause or invasive bacterial disease (calculated as the number of first events per 100 patient-years) was 19.4 with systematic treatment and 20.3 with guided treatment (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.63 to 1.44). At week 48, the corresponding rates were 12.8 and 13.3 (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.67 to 1.40]). At week 24, the probability of tuberculosis was lower with systematic treatment than with guided treatment (3.0% vs. 17.9%; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.26), but the probability of grade 3 or 4 drug-related adverse events was higher with systematic treatment (17.4% vs. 7.2%; adjusted hazard ratio 2.57; 95% CI, 1.75 to 3.78). Serious adverse events were more common with systematic treatment. Conclusions Among severely immunosuppressed adults with HIV infection who had not previously received ART, systematic treatment for tuberculosis was not superior to test-guided treatment in reducing the rate of death or invasive bacterial disease over 24 or 48 weeks and was associated with more grade 3 or 4 adverse events